Military firefighters protected flight lines, hangars, base housing, and ships in every branch of service. In the Navy, crash and salvage firefighting on flight decks and at naval air stations belongs to the Aviation Boatswain's Mate (Handling) rating, ABH, whose occupational standards include crash rescue, firefighting, crash removal, and damage control duties ashore and afloat. Army firefighters, MOS 12M, respond to structural and wildland fires, airfield and hazardous materials emergencies, and automobile, aircraft, and train accidents. Air Force Fire Protection specialists, AFSC 3E7X1, handle everything from structural fires to burning fuel and hazardous material incidents.
Two features of the job drove toxic exposure. First, in the 1970s the Department of Defense began using aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) to fight fuel fires, and military firefighters discharged it during emergencies and, over and over, during live fire training. AFFF contains PFAS, persistent chemicals that do not break down in the environment; the Department of Defense has identified 723 installations where PFAS may have been used or released. Second, every working fire generates combustion byproducts that NIOSH describes as known or suspected causes of cancer, and older base structures added asbestos to the smoke and debris. Repeated exposure across hundreds of responses and drills, often in gear soaked with foam and soot, is why this occupation appears so often in exposure related claims.
Exposures in This Job
AFFF firefighting foam
Beginning in the 1970s, the Department of Defense used aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) as its standard agent against petroleum fires. Military firefighters sprayed it on aircraft crashes, fuel spills, and vehicle fires, and discharged it repeatedly in live fire training exercises, which the VA identifies as a major source of chemical release on bases. The VA specifically notes that veterans who worked as military firefighters may have been exposed to PFAS while using AFFF to extinguish jet fuel fires. Foam contact with skin and soaked gloves and bunker gear extended exposure beyond the incident itself. The Department of Defense stopped using PFAS containing foam for training and, after invoking its second and final statutory waiver, must end AFFF use entirely by October 1, 2026.
PFAS (forever chemicals)
PFAS, the chemicals that make AFFF effective, are called forever chemicals because they persist in the body and the environment. Firefighters encountered them through direct skin contact with foam, through contaminated protective gear, and through drinking water: foam released during training and emergency responses is a major source of groundwater contamination on military bases, and the Department of Defense has identified 723 installations where PFAS may have been used or released. ATSDR reports epidemiological evidence associating PFOA with kidney and testicular cancer, along with changes in cholesterol, liver enzymes, and immune response. The VA describes the overall scientific and medical evidence on PFAS health effects as currently inconclusive.
Combustion byproducts (benzene, formaldehyde, smoke)
NIOSH researchers documented that firefighters encounter contaminants known or suspected to cause cancer, including combustion byproducts such as benzene and formaldehyde. Military firefighters inhaled and absorbed these chemicals during structural fires in base housing and hangars, during aircraft and vehicle fires fed by fuel and hydraulic fluid, and during overhaul work after a fire was knocked down, when crews often shed breathing apparatus while smoke still lingered. Soot on the skin and turnout gear that was rarely decontaminated kept the exposure going between calls. These exposures were the focus of the NIOSH study of nearly 30,000 career firefighters that found elevated cancer rates.
Asbestos
Many barracks, hangars, housing units, and shipboard spaces built before the 1980s contained asbestos insulation and building materials. When those structures burned or collapsed, asbestos fibers became airborne in the smoke and debris that firefighters worked in, both during suppression and during salvage and cleanup. NIOSH specifically pointed to asbestos from older building materials in fire debris as the likely explanation for its finding that firefighters developed malignant mesothelioma at twice the rate of the general United States population, the first study to document excess mesothelioma among United States firefighters.
Linked Health Conditions
A NIOSH study of nearly 30,000 career firefighters found 9 percent more cancer diagnoses and 14 percent more cancer deaths than expected, with excess cancers of the respiratory, digestive, and urinary systems and a mesothelioma rate twice that of the general population. Relevant pages include lung cancer, bladder cancer, and kidney cancer. A separate NIOSH analysis of California firefighters found increased risk of melanoma, acute myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, and cancers of the esophagus, prostate, brain, and kidney, with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and bladder cancer elevated among Black and Hispanic firefighters. ATSDR links PFOA, a PFAS found in older AFFF, to kidney and testicular cancer. Browse all cancer pages for VA rating criteria and screening guidance.
Supporting a VA Claim
A job title alone almost never creates a VA presumption. Presumptive status depends on where and when a veteran served: PACT Act burn pit locations, Vietnam era herbicide exposure, Camp Lejeune water service from 1953 to 1987, or radiation risk activities. AFFF and PFAS exposure is not currently on any VA presumptive list; the VA calls the scientific evidence inconclusive and decides these claims individually. Check presumptive conditions to see whether service location or era adds a presumptive pathway.
Firefighter exposure therefore usually supports a direct service connection claim, which requires a current diagnosis, credible evidence of exposure during service, and a medical nexus opinion linking the two. Under 38 CFR 3.303, the VA must consider the places, types, and circumstances of service shown in service records. Helpful evidence includes a DD214 and personnel records documenting the ABH rating, MOS 12M, or AFSC 3E7X1; training and certification records; buddy statements from crew members who witnessed foam discharges or fire responses; and official job descriptions that match the claimed exposure. A well documented claim may succeed, but no outcome is guaranteed. Start with the exposure check to map service history to likely exposures.
Sources
- https://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/pfas.asp
- https://www.va.gov/disability/eligibility/hazardous-materials-exposure/
- https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/bulletin/2017/firefighter-cancer.html
- https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/updates/upd-10-17-13.html
- https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/updates/upd-05-07-15.html
- https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-effects/index.html
- https://www.army.mil/article/199026/jblm_soldiers_with_12m_mos_fight_fires_respond_to_emergencies
- https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.303
See all military jobs, check the contamination documented at your base, or learn how to file a claim.
This page is for informational purposes only and is not medical or legal advice. Consult a qualified professional about your health or benefits.